These are just my quick notes - I'll come back to add reflections later...
Beth's story on the use of tags to improve the efficiency of using nptech tags (and others) - I could see that many non-profits (and schools) are using outdated and inefficienty tools to accomplish their goals.
Chris Heuer believes that tagging is the most important aspect of web2.0. All events should have their own unique tag. He discussed folksonomies, his launch of brainjams as a response to web2.1 and tagspaces as a response to an identified need to search tags by subsets of users. He introduced Paramedia - networks of people with access to media publishing tools and training.
Price of calling anywhere in the world has gone down
Bowling Alone was wrong -- we have more social ties than we used to to have, it is coming out of sleep and TV. We know about creating individual and organization capacity for facilitating change. We don't know much about building networking capacity.
Networks matter. And now we can map them and see them, and we can use network theory.
Talks about The rise of the "Do Not Call Network", and how fast people signed up Pug lovers network biggest on Meetup. 23,280 memeber in 133 groups. The FUH2 site http://www.fuh2.com/, Mapping craters, Chevy Tahoe commercials
David and Eric tackled a large topic, agreeing that the future of cell phones in helping developing markets is optimistic. They agree that If you want to see what's happening with cell phones you need to get out of the US to China, India & Africa. People aren't using them to just talk to people or check e-mails, but they're using SMS.
The uses of cell phones are coming because people are unserved, particularly around banking in Africa. The more regulated the market, the less creative the technology. The challenge is finding usage models that are of value to people. Lots of things are already being done, but they're not being done in an ecomically efficient way.
At some point an organizer benefits from understanding the nuts and bolts of how to do an event or activity. Michael's talk addresses this, but its not what I am looking for in this session.
I find that these types of tools are great for people that have personalities that already lend themselves to doing events or planning. But what about the people that are over-whelmed? Tired? Busy? Scared? Or may not really care?
Hope your conference is going well - wish I was there etc. etc.
It is a lovely sunrise here in Adelaide, South Australia - as you enjoy your afternoon tea break on day 1 of the conference. The purpose of this post is to give you all some feedback on how it feels 'attending' your conference remotely.
My 'flickrfox' images of photos tagged 'net2' are clearly picking up conference action, including a really interesting shot 'greg proves he is awake' - a man looking at a clock.
Some of the brief / rough liveblog notes from sessions (e.g. Marnie's)
The "latest and greatest" in open source devleopment for non-profits session was excellent, but I won't try to summarize. Way too much discussed, most of which I understood, some of which I simply missed. (And notes are of no help. I can't listen and write. I don't have the enthusiasm anymore. I keep imagining Alan Bennett at one of these things. Or better, trying to explain this stuff to him over lunch at a monastery ruin.)
One great line that stood out from the opening of the session: "Go forth and deploy!" I.e, dive in. Funny thing is that is EXACTLY what we've done with Manila since 2000 at <a xhref="http://www.bayareawritingproject.org">BAWP</a>. Looking back from the perspective of some of the deployment challenges mentioned in this workshop, we haven't done badly at all. Big question is, where do we go next? Open Source solution like Drupal makes sense based on what the presenters said here. OS communities of active developers, downloads and forums. A chance to avoid duplication of efforts (nice example of VolunteerMatch and HandsOn Network - 80% of the same stuff needed for both organizations yet 5 years ago each was alone in its development efforts, granting that such a challenge might have been an impossible challenge for open source at that point). Lots said about the need for the intermediary agencies (what Kern County Superintendent of Schools web team has played for us, an Application Service Provider). The fact is that to engineer something you need money. And it helps to no end if you have a fundamental need and some sort of notion of how the software might work to accomplish what it is you want to accomplish. Loved this comment (paraphrased): "Hey if it works for social change and it's Microsoft, so what? That's what differentiates this Open Source conversation from a commerical vendor conversation. Bravo for MS! Next topic?"