We have submited Agri Mashup for the DonateNow Mashup Challenge.

We are looking for AJAX programmers, they will help us implement mashup technologies for rural agri-enterprises .

Technical specifications:

Programming: Dojo AJAX

Databases supported: MySQL, PostgreSQL 

Spatial Databases supported: PostGIS, MySQL Spatial, ArcSDE

APIs supported: Google, Yahoo, Arc Web, Geonames, Open Streets, Network for Good (to be implemented)

Collaboration Tools: Drupal, Plone

Hosting Tools: ccHost

Mobile: SMS

Location

Location

Last night, Matt showed me the build for our autocomplete search. When a user wants to find a charity, the form will suggest what they're looking for. Now, for any veteran programmer, this would qualify as Ajax 101. Still, it was nice to see some of the tools we enjoy on other sites making a cameo on our own.

It made me think though- how much do these Web 2.0 Bells and Whistles help non-profits and for-profit businesses get heard? Now, I know that programming tricks definitely help usability- anything that makes a webpage more like a desktop is a great functionality to have. But do the aesthetic details (the bells and whistles) drive people to your cause?

Take, for example, a site called Dogster. Found at Dogster.com, it's got "Web 2.0" functionality, but the look of the site is more 1.0. There's no tag clouds, typical fonts, or tiny flourishes. Yet the site is a huge success.

I'd love to find out what you think- do the little things help a site reach its audience (profit or non-profit)? Does it matter if a site uses an autocomplete form instead of a simple list?

If you are trying to solve accessibility barriers for your software and / or Web 2.0 site, we will host a round table during the 3:15 sessions.  Anyone having accessibility interest, expertise or phobia...come join me and Glenda the Goodwitch for a lively problem solving session.